|
Home  > Disabilities > Insight: Learning and dyslexia
|
Learning disabilities
Insight: learning and dyslexia
Experimentation in 2006: Knowledge Master has been formally
experimented with dyslexics
Online
course:
Educational innovation for the
different learning styles
(dyslexia, ADD, autism, etc.) |
|
Among the specific learning disabilities, dyslexia is the most diffused
and, probably, the most insidious one hindering the full development
of students cognitive potential.
Both school and culture, indeed, consider the acquisition of reading
and writing abilities a fundamental prerequisite for the evolution
of learning processes.
In the
clinical patterns recognized as "dyslexia", precisely
these abilities are jeopardized at several levels. Even though, the
deficits that characterize dyslexia do not damage the
general cognitive abilities of these subjects: they remain solid and
consistent, but often restrained and unexpressed, due to the lack of
educational and representational media alternative to written text
or speech.
To have
a clear picture of the specific difficulties of these patterns and how
these can hinder learning, we must reflect on
the general meaning of the "reading process".
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
The
reading ability, as an ability to extract meaning,
relies on general cognitive processes that can develop according to
several modes. Of these modes sequential processing
of written text is only one example.
|
 |
In a
broad sense, reading implies cognitive processes of decoding
and comprehension: these are independent of any modality of
information representation, and are developed through the activity
of working memory.
When reading text, these general processes are developed mainly
through sequential processing,
carried out at several levels, moving progressively from phonetic
analysis to lexical analysis, then to syntactical and last the
semantic.
At a perceptive (auditive and visual) processing level, a
more cognitive processing and integration takes place.
|
Hence,
processing implies a long process that considerably overloads
working memory. With learning during the primary school first year,
this process is progressively automated enabling the reading
of text.
This is a result of an extremely complex coordination of numerous
processes that occur in a few fractions of a second and that are
repeated in a continuous cycle during the reading session.
|
Only
through several sequential processing levels, the reader can
gradually extract, from the text superficial structure, its deep
structure, i.e. its cognitive structure.
|
 |
|
 |
|
In dyslexics there are:
 |
a
first level of neuropsychological dysfunction that can
comprise the perceptive discrimination capacity, at the phonetic
and/or visual level, and the phonologic and visuospatial
subsystems correlated to perceptive functions;
|
 |
a second
level of
dysfunction, at the level of cognitive integration,
that involves the operation of working memory: the
lack of automation of the reading procedure limits its efficacy,
reducing the possibility of distributing the attention in
parallel. It can therefore find an obstacle or a slowdown in the
comprehension processes, due to an overload of the sequential
processing channels.
|

|
 |
|
 |
|
But the
general cognitive process of decoding and comprehension, at the
basis of reading, can be accomplished by the working memory even
through a different processing mode.
There
are some other freer and more efficient ways in processing:
the graphical-logical representation of information engages the
"reader" in an
optimal short cut to activate the working memory system:
global-synthetic processing.
Regarding images and graphic representations, working memory, through the
support of the visuospatial sketchpad activates a
global-synthetic processing mode that is at the base of perception, visual thinking
and logical processing.
These modes are specially functional in cognitive processing in
dyslexics and represent the main channel through which they can
accomplish the decoding and comprehension processes.
Considered
in itself, the graphic mode is not sufficient to
represent all kinds of knowledge: images do not have the same power
as words to represent meanings conceptually.
|
 |
But
graphic representations can
be used to modulate and support
the representation of meanings developed through verbal propositions.
|
|
Colors,
shapes, symmetries, coherent graphic structures can be used to
point out and explicate the logical structure of verbal knowledge,
reducing to a minimum the need of phrases and complex periods to
efficiently represent meaning.
|
|
 |
|
A
Knowledge Master concept map is constructed on these principles:
 |
a
verbal text, reduced to its essence of propositional
structure, is cast with a graphical and logical knowledge
representation; |
 |
together,
these two aspects can most relevantly represent the cognitive
structure of the contents to be learnt; |
 |
the inclusion of
images and multimedia promotes a reinforcement of the communication
of meaning. |
 |
Knowledge Master's analysis and interaction functions facilitate the cognitive
dialog, favoring a faster, deeper and long lasting learning. |
 |
the active voice
support brings communication with students nearer to the
ways human communicate. |
Using concept
maps technology enables a more immediate and direct access to meaning: this
representation format, when supported by Knowledge Master
(and its specially developed functions), can
indeed exalt the cognitive potential of dyslexic students, with an
effective stimulation of their categorization and relational abilities, of
reasoning and knowledge integration. It is the dialog through the knowledge
management functions that facilitates learning. The specific functions of Knowledge Master facilitate and augment the dialog possibilities of the dyslexics
with the represented knowledge.
An effective
educational strategy for dyslexics can be based on the knowledge management concept
mapping strategy, because it can stimulate the key processes of the
cognitive activity producing an outstanding improvement in the quality of
learning through interaction.
|
 |
|
![]() |
|

 |
|
:: Learning disabilities ::
|
 |
::
Experimentation :: |
|
|
 |
|
![]() |
| |
|